Under plaintiffs’ allegations, the defendant officers were dealing with a property dispute and not a situation of true exigency like a burglary report. The record also showed that the complainant was a “friend of the police.” Gallagher v. City of Winlock, 287 Fed. Appx. 568 (9th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*<\/p>\n
Informant’s information was corroborated as in Gates<\/em>, so there was probable cause for the stop and search. United States v. McBurney, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54230 (D. Minn. February 15, 2008).*<\/p>\n Officer’s independently had reasonable suspicion for a stop of defendant’s vehicle, so the prior illegal search of his house was not the but for cause of the stop of the car. United States v. Li, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54501 (D. Colo. July 9, 2008).*<\/p>\n There was probable cause on the totality of circumstances. Defendant’s attack on the search warrant affidavit was against parts of it and essentially downplayed the standard of review of a search warrant: totality of circumstances. b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading
\nUnited States v. Hayden, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54367 (N.D. Ind. July 16, 2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"