{"id":2242,"date":"2008-12-23T16:42:55","date_gmt":"2008-07-09T07:53:29","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-07-09T07:53:29","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2242","title":{"rendered":"Dog sniff of storage unit was valid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dog sniff of storage units was not unreasonable, so alert on defendant&#8217;s unit created probable cause. The area outside the storage unit was not private. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/12\/2008\/2008-ohio-3380.pdf\">State v. Harris<\/a>, 2008 Ohio 3380, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 2859 (12th Dist. July 7, 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>State&#8217;s alternative ground to support search was not litigated below so the appellate court would not rely on it. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/4\/2008\/2008-ohio-3349.pdf\">State v. Hansard<\/a>, 2008 Ohio 3349, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 2853 (4th Dist. June 25, 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>Homeland Security was surveilling defendant in a motel room as a marijuana dealer in Plattsburg, NY. He paid cash and had no check out date. &#8220;He approached defendant in the parking lot, displayed his badge and asked if defendant would speak to him (defendant said &#8216;yes&#8217;); he then asked, &#8216;Do you smoke dope?&#8217; (defendant said &#8216;yes&#8217;) and if defendant had any on him (defendant hesitated and then indicated he had some in his backpack). We agree that, after the initial request to speak, the agent&#8217;s &#8216;inquiry focus[ed] on the possible criminality of [defendant]&#8217; a level two De Bour inquiry which was justified as the agent had a &#8216;founded suspicion that criminality [was] afoot. &#8230;'&#8221; Consent was valid. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.ny.us\/reporter\/3dseries\/2008\/2008_05973.htm\">People v. Oldacre<\/a>, 2008 NY Slip Op 5973, 53 A.D.3d 675 (3d Dept. 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>While Louisiana recognizes standing in any person affected by a search, defendant could not show he was affected by this search. State v. Lewis, 988 So. 2d 789 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2242\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2242"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2242\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}