{"id":2237,"date":"2008-08-31T19:49:35","date_gmt":"2008-07-08T08:10:48","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-07-08T08:10:48","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2237","title":{"rendered":"CA6:  Reaching to small of back on seeing police in a high crime area was reasonable suspicion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On getting out of a car in a high crime area, defendant saw the police, hunched over, and reached to the small of his back. The officer could reasonably conclude he was reaching to check on a weapon or drugs and not just putting his wallet away. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/08a0240p-06.pdf\">United States v. Pearce<\/a>, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14187, 2008 FED App. 0240P (6th Cir. July 3, 2008):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Officer Johnson reasonably suspected that &#8220;Johnson had a weapon and was getting ready to fire.&#8221; J.A. at 75-76. Indeed, even from a layman&#8217;s perspective, Johnson&#8217;s behavior, while susceptible of an innocent explanation&#8211;Johnson may have simply been trying to put his wallet away&#8211;might also have been reasonably viewed as an attempt to conceal a weapon and\/or other contraband material, such as narcotics, from a police officer who had just appeared on the scene. See <em>Arvizu<\/em>, 534 U.S. at 277 (&#8220;A determination that reasonable suspicion exists &#8230; need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.&#8221;). When combined with the fact that Johnson was engaged in such behavior in an area known for criminal activity and on a street where a crime-related homicide had recently occurred, Officer Shaughnessy&#8217;s observations provided a sufficient basis for temporarily detaining Johnson to determine whether or not he was actually engaged in wrongdoing. ,,,<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Attempted murder conviction reversed because the trial court failed to conduct a suppression hearing on defendant&#8217;s motion which made a prima facie case. Defendant did not even request a hearing in the motion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nvsupremecourt.us\/documents\/advOpinions\/124NevAdvOpNo42.pdf\">Somee v. State<\/a>, 187 P.3d 152, 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 42 (2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2237\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}