{"id":22219,"date":"2016-05-20T00:01:35","date_gmt":"2016-05-20T05:01:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=22219"},"modified":"2016-05-19T17:37:53","modified_gmt":"2016-05-19T22:37:53","slug":"w-d-n-y-no-point-in-reopening-suppression-hearing-for-new-evidence-that-wont-change-the-outcome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=22219","title":{"rendered":"W.D.N.Y.: No point in reopening suppression hearing for new evidence that won&#8217;t change the outcome"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant sought to reopen the suppression hearing, and it\u2019s denied because the new evidence wouldn\u2019t alter the outcome at all on the question of apparent consent. United States v. Archambault, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61783 (W.D.N.Y. May 9, 2016).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe odor of raw marijuana, especially in light of Defendant&#8217;s furtive actions and refusal to comply with commands, establishes probable cause.\u201d United States v. Jackson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61695 (N.D.Ga. March 22, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61486 (N.D. Ga. May 9, 2016).*<\/p>\n<p>There was probable cause for the automobile exception search of defendant\u2019s car based on all the officers knew. United States v. Engstrom, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64828 (D.Nev. March 2, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant sought to reopen the suppression hearing, and it\u2019s denied because the new evidence wouldn\u2019t alter the outcome at all on the question of apparent consent. United States v. Archambault, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61783 (W.D.N.Y. May 9, 2016). \u201cThe &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=22219\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,66],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-burden-of-proof"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22219"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22219\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22220,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22219\/revisions\/22220"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}