{"id":21719,"date":"2016-04-17T00:01:05","date_gmt":"2016-04-17T05:01:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21719"},"modified":"2016-04-16T22:16:57","modified_gmt":"2016-04-17T03:16:57","slug":"tn-not-deficient-performance-for-iac-where-fourth-amendment-argument-hadnt-yet-been-recognized","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21719","title":{"rendered":"TN: Not deficient performance for IAC where Fourth Amendment argument hadn&#8217;t yet been recognized"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It was not deficient performance on the part of trial counsel to fail to argue that text messages should have been suppressed, a legal theory which, at the time, lacked statutory or precedential support. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/sites\/default\/files\/vaughnjefferyopn.pdf\">Vaughn v. State<\/a>, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 278 (April 12, 2016)<\/p>\n<p>The \u201cfear of the penalties for refusal is not sufficient to show he was coerced to consent.\u201d The implied consent law has already been upheld. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ndcourts.gov\/_court\/opinions\/20150344.htm\">Schmidt v. Levi<\/a>, 2016 ND 80, 2016 N.D. LEXIS 74 (April 12, 2016).*<\/p>\n<p>The outer door to defendant\u2019s apartment hallway wasn\u2019t locked but the court, at defendant\u2019s invitation, treats it as his apartment\u2019s porch, and the police entry to talk to him was reasonable. The police were admitted by consent, and the continuance of their presence was also by consent. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nebraska.gov\/apps-courts-epub\/public\/viewOpinion?docId=N00002988PUB\">State v. Turner<\/a>, 23 Neb. App. 897, 2016 Neb. App. LEXIS 81 (April 12, 2016);* <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nebraska.gov\/apps-courts-epub\/public\/viewOpinion?docId=N00002989PUB\">State v. Bond<\/a>, 23 Neb. App. 916, 2016 Neb. App. LEXIS 80 (April 12, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It was not deficient performance on the part of trial counsel to fail to argue that text messages should have been suppressed, a legal theory which, at the time, lacked statutory or precedential support. Vaughn v. State, 2016 Tenn. Crim. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=21719\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,19,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent","category-curtilage","category-ineffective-assistance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21719"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21722,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21719\/revisions\/21722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}