“The rapid, natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood creates a single-factor exigent circumstance that will justify the police taking a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw from a defendant, provided that the police have probable cause to believe that defendant committed criminal vehicular homicide or operation.” State v. Shriner, 751 N.W.2d 538 (Minn. 2008).*<\/p>\n
Officer’s viewing of defendant swerving within his own lane and driving erratically was sufficient to support his stop. State v. Loy<\/a>, 2008 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 425 (May 30, 2008).*<\/p>\n Officer had probable cause to search both driver and passenger when the car was stopped and they both smelled of burnt marijuana. State v. Fewell<\/a>, 286 Kan. 370, 184 P.3d 903 (2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading