{"id":2120,"date":"2008-12-07T23:55:13","date_gmt":"2008-06-01T23:45:07","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-06-01T23:45:07","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2120","title":{"rendered":"Housemates had apparent authority to consent to a common area of defendant&#8217;s house"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Housemates had common authority to consent to a search of the common areas of defendant&#8217;s house. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexisone.com\/lx1\/caselaw\/freecaselaw?searchType=citation&amp;fclSearch=2008+La.+App.+LEXIS+809+&amp;action=FCLSearchCaseByCitation&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;format=CITE&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;sourceID=&amp;citation=2008+La.+App.+LEXIS+806+&amp;searchTerm=\">State v. Robinson<\/a>, 986 So. 2d 716 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008)*; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/2\/2008\/2008-ohio-2587.pdf\">State v. Butt<\/a>, 2008 Ohio 2587, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 2164 (2d Dist. May 30, 2008)*.<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was stopped in a high crime area, and he was startled and acted nervous. That added up to reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexisone.com\/lx1\/caselaw\/freecaselaw?searchType=citation&amp;fclSearch=2008+La.+App.+LEXIS+809+&amp;action=FCLSearchCaseByCitation&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;format=CITE&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;sourceID=&amp;citation=2008+La.+App.+LEXIS+809+&amp;searchTerm=\">State v. Honeycutt<\/a>, 987 So. 2d 250 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008), released for publication August 1, 2008*; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexisone.com\/lx1\/caselaw\/freecaselaw?searchType=citation&amp;fclSearch=2008+La.+App.+LEXIS+809+&amp;action=FCLSearchCaseByCitation&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;format=CITE&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;sourceID=&amp;citation=2008+La.+App.+LEXIS+791+&amp;searchTerm=\">State v. Huntley<\/a>, 986 So. 2d 792 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>Mistake of fact as to the purpose of the stop of the defendant for a malfunctioning light was not enough to void it because the lights looked like they were malfunctioning. United States v. McHugh, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42171 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2120\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}