Police use of a regular CI who was a known methamphetamine user made him one that could be relied on to score them meth. \u201cConsidering the CI’s history and personal observation of activity at 1415, a reasonably prudent officer would be justified in relying on the CI’s information.\u201d United States v. Rickard, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27291 (D.Neb. March 3, 2016).<\/p>\n
The car defendant was in was stopped for a \u201crough movement\u201d on the streets. The driver\u2019s condition suggested being under the influence, but no alcohol was smelled. The officer then suspected drugs were responsible, and he asked for and got valid consent to search. The stop was not unreasonably prolonged. Crider v. State<\/a>, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 126 (March 7, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Police use of a regular CI who was a known methamphetamine user made him one that could be relied on to score them meth. \u201cConsidering the CI’s history and personal observation of activity at 1415, a reasonably prudent officer would … Continue reading