Government\u2019s new Fourth Amendment exception argument in motion to reconsider is denied. \u201cThe United States notified the Court that it was not filing any post-hearing memoranda. The United States could have, and indeed should have, advanced the inevitable discovery doctrine at the suppression hearing, in oral arguments held immediately following the suppression hearing, or in post-hearing briefs which the Government chose not to file. Under these circumstances, the United States’ eleventh-hour motion for reconsideration is too little, too late.\u201d United States v. Mack, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 961 (M.D.La. Jan. 6, 2016).<\/p>\n
Blocking an intersection for a minute causing other cars to honk was reason for a stop. United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 793 (N.D.Cal. Jan. 4, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Government\u2019s new Fourth Amendment exception argument in motion to reconsider is denied. \u201cThe United States notified the Court that it was not filing any post-hearing memoranda. The United States could have, and indeed should have, advanced the inevitable discovery doctrine … Continue reading