The officer told defendant that he was \u201cgood to go\u201d but sought consent to go through his pockets and then told him to turn the pockets inside out. That was a Rodriguez violation, and the motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Vasquez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169411 (M.D.Fla. Dec. 17, 2015).<\/p>\n
The CI was in the criminal milieu and had just been arrested when he gave the tip on defendant. It was detailed enough and corroborated by security video of drugs going into defendant\u2019s car. United States v. Almaatani<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22169 (6th Cir. Dec. 17, 2015).*<\/p>\n The officer saw a large flower necklace hanging on the rear view mirror and called in the LPN. Dispatch responded that there were warrants on the owner. The stop was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Brown, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169393 (D.Nev. Sept. 9, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The officer told defendant that he was \u201cgood to go\u201d but sought consent to go through his pockets and then told him to turn the pockets inside out. That was a Rodriguez violation, and the motion to suppress is granted. … Continue reading