{"id":1996,"date":"2008-05-31T08:39:38","date_gmt":"2008-04-18T07:37:35","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-04-18T07:37:35","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1996","title":{"rendered":"Guns and exigent circumstances"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Officer saw a cocked gun in defendant&#8217;s yard by looking over the fence, and there was a 7 year old child in the yard. The entry into the yard was justified by exigent circumstances. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/opinions\/documents\/C052924A.PDF\">People v. Chavez<\/a>, 161 Cal. App. 4th 1493, 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376 (3d Dist. March 27, 2008), ordered published April 17, 2008:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The People first contend that no search occurred because Officer Leahy observed the revolver in plain sight while lawfully positioned in defendant&#8217;s front yard in an area open to the public. Secondly, the People contend that the subsequent warrantless entry into defendant&#8217;s side yard was justified by the exigency of a cocked revolver at a residence with a seven-year-old child. We agree with the People that Officer Leahy&#8217;s observations of the gun from over the fence did not amount to a search and his subsequent entry into defendant&#8217;s yard was justified by exigent circumstances. Therefore, the trial court erred in granting defendant&#8217;s motion to suppress. Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment of dismissal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Officers had a tip that a fugitive was at defendant&#8217;s house. When they arrived they saw two men enter, one with a gun, and they got to the door and saw a gun on the floor. That was sufficient exigency for an entry to secure the weapon. United States v. Scott, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31076 (M.D. Fla. April 15, 2008)* (&#8220;The Court finds this case analogous to the circumstances in <em>United States v. McCoy<\/em>, 2007 WL 4393973 (11th Cir. 2007).&#8221;).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1996\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1996"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1996\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}