{"id":19956,"date":"2015-12-14T00:54:23","date_gmt":"2015-12-14T05:54:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=19956"},"modified":"2015-12-13T18:45:40","modified_gmt":"2015-12-13T23:45:40","slug":"id-a-valid-dealer-tag-is-not-reasonable-suspicion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=19956","title":{"rendered":"ID: A valid dealer tag is not reasonable suspicion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201c[A] properly displayed dealer plate carries with it a presumption of validity and cannot serve as the sole basis for reasonable suspicion to allow an officer to stop a vehicle. A contrary holding would permit law enforcement officers unfettered discretion to stop vehicles being operated with a dealer plate to investigate its validity whenever they believe the use is occurring outside of business hours. See Salois, 144 Idaho at 348, 160 P.3d at 1283. Such a rule would be untenable as there are multiple legitimate uses of dealer plates outside of business hours and it would unreasonably subject legitimate dealer plate users to investigatory stops whenever an officer believes dealerships are closed. Moreover, as we have noted, the statute imposes no such business hours limitation.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/42363.pdf\">State v. Case<\/a>, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 127 (Dec. 9, 2015)<\/p>\n<p>Defendant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate her Fourth Amendment claim and did, so it can\u2019t be pursued in a \u00a7 2255. Johnson v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166243 (N.D.Ga. Nov. 3, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201c[A] properly displayed dealer plate carries with it a presumption of validity and cannot serve as the sole basis for reasonable suspicion to allow an officer to stop a vehicle. A contrary holding would permit law enforcement officers unfettered discretion &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=19956\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19956"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19957,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19956\/revisions\/19957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}