Defendant had no standing over government search of a corporation\u2019s website without showing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched. [If it\u2019s on the Internet and open to the world, how is there conceivably any privacy interest in it. This isn\u2019t even close.] United States v. Waddell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157187 (S.D.Ga. Nov. 20, 2015).<\/p>\n
A zoning official took photographs of plaintiff\u2019s backyard from a neighbor\u2019s yard. This was not an illegal trespass on plaintiff\u2019s property, aside from the fact it was not raised timely. Looney v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 2015 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2699 (New London Oct. 23, 2015).*<\/p>\n
Because the product of a computer search was used in trial and it was found nonprejudicial for IAC purposes, it wasn\u2019t necessary to decide whether defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress in the first place. United States v. Hock<\/a>, 2015 CCA LEXIS 529 (N.-M. Ct. Crim. App. Nov. 24, 2015).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant had no standing over government search of a corporation\u2019s website without showing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched. [If it\u2019s on the Internet and open to the world, how is there conceivably any … Continue reading