{"id":1965,"date":"2008-08-31T16:29:30","date_gmt":"2008-04-07T11:34:44","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-04-07T11:34:44","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1965","title":{"rendered":"UT:  Detaining passengers was unreasonable because there was no reasonable suspicion or probable cause as to them"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Detaining the passengers was unlawful under <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=06-8120\"><em>Brendlin<\/em><\/a>. There was cause to detain the driver, but not the passengers, and the officer would not let them leave. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.utcourts.gov\/opinions\/appopin\/baker040308.pdf\">State v. Baker<\/a>, 2008 UT App 115, 182 P.3d 935, 601 Utah Adv. Rep. 6 (2008):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Moreover, the desire to check the vehicle for controlled substances did not require the presence of the passengers, 4 yet Officer Robertson admitted that the passengers were not free to leave while the K-9 unit was en route. Thus, the officers needed some reasonable articulable suspicion to lawfully detain Baker and the other passengers while awaiting the K-9 unit&#8217;s arrival. At the time Officer Robertson requested a K-9 unit, the officers had seen only one knife in a passenger&#8217;s possession (and not in Baker&#8217;s possession). While it was the early morning hours, and there were four passengers in the car, nothing in the officers&#8217; testimony indicates any particularized suspicion involving criminal activity on the part of the passengers; thus, continued detention was impermissible.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Drug interdiction officer who admitted targetted car with out of state license to follow it until it committed a traffic violation was authorized to investigate traffic offenses as well, despite narrowly drawn statutes on their authority, because of the potential of vehicle forfeiture. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oscn.net\/applications\/oscn\/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=451392\">King v. State<\/a>, 2008 OK CR 13, 182 P.3d 842 (April 4, 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>Since the initial stop produced reasonable suspicion, a twenty minute delay in arrival of a drug dog after defendant refused consent was not unreasonable. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.6thcoa.courts.state.tx.us\/opinions\/HTMLopinion.asp?OpinionID=9206\">Love v. State<\/a>, 252 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. App. \u2014 Texarkana 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>Consent was voluntary and the request to look in the car permitted the officer to look in the trunk where he found cocaine in a supermarket bag. The stop was handled quite quickly from obtaining the driver&#8217;s license to getting back the information by radio. The fact that the officer would have sought a drug dog if consent was refused was never communicated to the defendant, so it was not a factor. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.11thcoa.courts.state.tx.us\/opinions\/HTMLOpinion.asp?OpinionID=8934\">Caraway v. State<\/a>, 255 S.W.3d 302 (Tex. App. \u2014 Eastland 2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1965\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1965"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1965\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}