It was reasonable for the officer to ask about defendant having a firearm in the car when responding to a 911 call without Mirandizing him under its \u201cpublic safety exception.\u201d When defendant admitted there was a gun, the officer had exigent circumstances to find it and neutralize it. United States v. Graham, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122426 (D.S.C. September 15, 2015).<\/p>\n
2255 petitioner\u2019s conclusory allegations that defense counsel did not pursue a motion to suppress is denied. No facts or issues are identified. Irvin v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122506 (N.D.Tex. September 15, 2015).*<\/p>\n
The CI\u2019s information about defendant\u2019s current activities was corroborated by his five heroin deals with defendant. United States v. Altemus, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122824 (E.D.Mo. March 9, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It was reasonable for the officer to ask about defendant having a firearm in the car when responding to a 911 call without Mirandizing him under its \u201cpublic safety exception.\u201d When defendant admitted there was a gun, the officer had … Continue reading