{"id":18640,"date":"2015-08-31T00:45:13","date_gmt":"2015-08-31T05:45:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18640"},"modified":"2017-03-05T19:02:26","modified_gmt":"2017-03-06T00:02:26","slug":"or-its-the-states-burden-to-argue-any-exceptions-to-the-warrant-requirement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18640","title":{"rendered":"OR: It\u2019s the state\u2019s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s the state\u2019s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/A148894.pdf\">State v. Maciel-Figueroa<\/a>, 273 Ore. App. 298, 356 P.3d 674  (2015) (under submission 2\u00bd years), aff&#8217;d, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/S063651.pdf\">State v. Maciel-Figueroa<\/a>, 361 Ore. 163, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 166 (March 2, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was unconscious at the hospital, but there were no exigent circumstances justifying taking his blood without a search warrant. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=9e4714ba-daa9-443b-b4d6-a9d401f0f775&#038;MediaID=0a53262f-f510-495c-8111-0b15cd36ad4f&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">State v. Ruiz<\/a>, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8961 (Tex. App. \u2013 Corpus Christi \u2013 Edinburg August 27, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>A factual dispute on whether the officer knew that there was an order of protection against the plaintiff precluded summary judgment for the officer for unnecessarily handcuffing him. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/15a0602n-06.pdf\">al-Lamadani v. Lang<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15235 (6th Cir. August 26, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s the state\u2019s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement. State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 273 Ore. App. 298, 356 P.3d 674 (2015) (under submission 2\u00bd years), aff&#8217;d, State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 361 Ore. 163, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 166 (March 2, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=18640\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,66,55,3,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-45","category-burden-of-proof","category-drug-testing","category-emergency-exigency","category-qualified-immunity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18640"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18640\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26095,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18640\/revisions\/26095"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}