The search warrant here was for medical records of a clinic and in storage. The defendant doctor who filed the motion to suppress sold the clinic and kept a 5% share. Records were in storage, too. The court concludes that this defendant lacked standing in the records of the clinic based on the relationship he kept with them. United States v. Wilcox, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64212 (D.Utah May 15, 2015).<\/p>\n
On reconsideration after Rodriguez, the continuation of the stop was reasonable. United States v. Rivera, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63697 (E.D. N.Y. May 14, 2015).*<\/p>\n
The need for probable cause to arrest is well established, and fact questions remain for trial. Summary judgment on qualified immunity properly denied. Sutton v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County<\/a>, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8073 (6th Cir. May 14, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The search warrant here was for medical records of a clinic and in storage. The defendant doctor who filed the motion to suppress sold the clinic and kept a 5% share. Records were in storage, too. The court concludes that … Continue reading