{"id":17053,"date":"2015-05-01T13:31:02","date_gmt":"2015-05-01T18:31:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=17053"},"modified":"2015-05-01T13:31:02","modified_gmt":"2015-05-01T18:31:02","slug":"tx7-riley-applied-to-cell-phone-search-incident-where-it-came-down-between-trial-and-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=17053","title":{"rendered":"TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Search incident cannot support a cell phone search under Riley. Riley came down between trial and appeal, so it applies here because the issue was preserved. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=a78e05af-8d1b-455f-8319-8105608ae002&#038;MediaID=4a3affe7-da2f-4689-b10d-660733cf497e&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">Carter v. State<\/a>, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4271 (Tex. App. \u2013 Amarillo April 27, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant had no standing to challenge the search of a car in which he was riding. The case he cites for standing involved standing to challenge a stop, and it\u2019s simply inapplicable. <a href=\"http:\/\/courts.delaware.gov\/opinions\/(1irv5o45bey1uzz5hlkcmvqo)\/download.aspx?ID=222810\">State v. Massas<\/a>, 2015 Del. Super. LEXIS 214 (April 24, 2015).*<\/p>\n<p>The CI\u2019s statement that he bought meth from the defendant at a trailer was corroborated by observations of the trailer which had all the appearances of a production site for methamphetamine rather than being a residence. The truck outside hadn\u2019t been moved, there were multiple propane tanks and some were discolored. The Franks challenge about the tanks also fails. United States v. Dubrowski, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56639 (N.D. W.Va. April 30, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Search incident cannot support a cell phone search under Riley. Riley came down between trial and appeal, so it applies here because the issue was preserved. Carter v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4271 (Tex. App. \u2013 Amarillo April 27, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=17053\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,44,20,26,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-informant-hearsay","category-probable-cause","category-search-incident","category-standing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17054,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17053\/revisions\/17054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}