{"id":1652,"date":"2008-05-28T07:08:22","date_gmt":"2008-01-02T06:51:17","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-02T06:51:17","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1652","title":{"rendered":"Anonymous tip was sufficiently corroborated to show probable cause"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant was not entitled to a <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=438&amp;invol=154\"><em>Franks<\/em><\/a> hearing. There was an anonymous tip, but it was significantly corroborated by defendant&#8217;s possession of a small amount of marijuana in his car. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/07a0871n-06.pdf\">United States v. Yarbrough<\/a>, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 30058, 2007 FED App. 0871N (6th Cir. December 20, 2007)* (unpublished):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Yarbrough concedes the presence of marijuana in the car, yet maintains the small amount indicates personal use. Even if we accept this premise, the presence of any marijuana in a vehicle outside of a residence where police have received an anonymous tip of drug activity contributes to a finding of probable cause. See <em>Elkins<\/em>, 300 F.3d at 659-60 (anonymous tip plus smell of marijuana provided probable cause for search warrant); <em>United States v. Smith<\/em>, 783 F.2d 648, 651-52 (6th Cir. 1986) (tip from confidential informant plus marijuana plant growing outside of house provided probable cause).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Plaintiff did not show a future likelihood of being searched under a local ordinance to justify finding an Art. III case or controversy. Sapienza v. Forest Preserve Dist., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94777 (N.D. Ill. December 28, 2007).*<\/p>\n<p>The trial court&#8217;s jury instruction on consent to a strip search accurately reflected the law that consent did not have to be &#8220;express&#8221; as long as the defendant officer would reasonably believe that consent had been given. Plaintiff was entitled to a new trial in a \u00a7 1983 case for an illegal search where the defendant put plaintiff&#8217;s drug history in over objection. It was more prejudicial than relevant.  Reppert v. Marino, 259 Fed. Appx. 481 (3d Cir. 2007)* (unpublished).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1652\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1652\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}