{"id":16238,"date":"2015-03-06T09:33:28","date_gmt":"2015-03-06T14:33:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=16238"},"modified":"2015-03-06T09:33:28","modified_gmt":"2015-03-06T14:33:28","slug":"la4-no-procedure-to-reopen-a-motion-to-suppress-after-the-verdict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=16238","title":{"rendered":"LA4: No procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No motion to suppress had been filed, so the appellate court doesn\u2019t consider it. There\u2019s also no procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.la4th.org\/opinion\/2014\/374716.pdf\">State v. Marx<\/a>, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 435 (La.App. 4 Cir. March 4, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>While individual factors here may not mean anything alone, on the totality the court finds reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/A151058.pdf\">State v. Nichols<\/a>, 269 Or. App. 429 (March 5, 2015).*<\/p>\n<p>While executing a search warrant for marijuana shipped from Los Angeles at unit 806 of a duplex, officers went into the crawlspace and could see through a hole into 804&#8217;s crawlspace and found more of the same boxes. The look was reasonable, and the hole lessened the reasonable expectation of privacy. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/5\/2015\/2015-Ohio-779.pdf\">State v. Perry<\/a>, 2015-Ohio-779, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 725 (5th Dist. March 2, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No motion to suppress had been filed, so the appellate court doesn\u2019t consider it. There\u2019s also no procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict. State v. Marx, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 435 (La.App. 4 Cir. March 4, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=16238\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,18,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-motion-to-suppress","category-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16238"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16239,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16238\/revisions\/16239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}