{"id":16207,"date":"2015-03-04T16:39:45","date_gmt":"2015-03-04T21:39:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=16207"},"modified":"2015-03-04T16:39:45","modified_gmt":"2015-03-04T21:39:45","slug":"scotusblog-argument-summary-how-does-requiring-a-warrant-interfere-with-surprise-police-searches-of-hotel-guest-registers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=16207","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUSBlog: Argument summary: How does requiring a warrant interfere with surprise police searches of hotel guest registers?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SCOTUSBlog: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/2015\/03\/argument-summary-how-does-requiring-a-warrant-interfere-with-surprise-police-searches-of-hotel-guest-registers\/\">Argument summary: How does requiring a warrant interfere with surprise police searches of hotel guest registers?<\/a> by Rory Little:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The first case argued Tuesday morning, City of Los Angeles v. Patel, was about whether a Los Angeles ordinance that requires motel operators to allow the police to examine hotel guest registers, without seeking a warrant first, is constitutional. The en banc Ninth Circuit ruled that is is not, because the ordinance lacks an \u201cessential procedural safeguard\u2026 pre-compliance judicial review.\u201d Prior to argument, many observers thought this meant that some judicial \u201cadministrative warrant\u201d process was required. But now, after reviewing the argument transcript, confusion regarding exactly what the plaintiffs are seeking, as expressed by more than one Justice, may lead to reversal and remand rather than a substantive Fourth Amendment ruling.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SCOTUSBlog: Argument summary: How does requiring a warrant interfere with surprise police searches of hotel guest registers? by Rory Little: The first case argued Tuesday morning, City of Los Angeles v. Patel, was about whether a Los Angeles ordinance that &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=16207\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative-search","category-scotus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16207"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16207\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16208,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16207\/revisions\/16208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}