Because weapons have enduring value to the possessor, a five week delay in using that information to search defendant\u2019s house was not stale. United States v. Korey, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20532 (W.D.Pa. February 20, 2015).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s wife could consent to a search of the household computer that produced child pornography. Her husband was already on the police radar as a potential child molester, but uncharged. She was disgusted by what she found on the computer and wanted the police to take and search the computer, and that was valid consent by a joint owner. United States v. Files, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182188 (W.D. Mo. December 9, 2014).*<\/p>\n
The trial court did not err by denying the motion to suppress a blood specimen and the results of a BAC test of the specimen because defendant voluntarily consented as he agreed that the physician could draw his blood and no evidence in the record indicated that any officer told defendant his blood draw was mandatory. Donjuan v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 1618 (Tex. App.\u2013Houston (14th Dist.) February 19, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Because weapons have enduring value to the possessor, a five week delay in using that information to search defendant\u2019s house was not stale. United States v. Korey, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20532 (W.D.Pa. February 20, 2015). Defendant\u2019s wife could consent … Continue reading