{"id":15667,"date":"2015-01-31T11:14:40","date_gmt":"2015-01-31T16:14:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15667"},"modified":"2015-01-31T11:14:40","modified_gmt":"2015-01-31T16:14:40","slug":"oh9-one-day-delay-in-getting-cell-phone-sw-after-exigent-based-seizure-not-unreasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15667","title":{"rendered":"OH9: One day delay in getting cell phone SW after exigent based seizure not unreasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Police seized defendant\u2019s phone because of suspected child pornography on it. The warrant to search the phone was not issued until the following day. Defendant cites no authority that a one day delay was unreasonable. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/9\/2015\/2015-ohio-284.pdf\">State v. Welch<\/a>, 2015-Ohio-284, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 243 (9th Dist. January 28, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s consent was voluntary. This case is just like <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=2279225853676723279&#038;q=drayton&#038;hl=en&#038;as_sdt=1002\">Drayton<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/14\/14-1318.pdf\">United States v. Valdez-Perea<\/a>, 14-1318 (10th Cir. January 27, 2015).*<\/p>\n<p>Temporal proximity of request for consent from unlawful seizure of backpack was too close, and the state\u2019s argument essentially overlooks the illegal seizure. Suppressed. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/A151946.pdf\">State v. Young<\/a>, 268 Ore. App. 688, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 86 (January 28, 2015).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Police seized defendant\u2019s phone because of suspected child pornography on it. The warrant to search the phone was not issued until the following day. Defendant cites no authority that a one day delay was unreasonable. State v. Welch, 2015-Ohio-284, 2015 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15667\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[75,5,24,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-attenuation","category-cell-phones","category-consent","category-warrant-requirement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15667"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15668,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15667\/revisions\/15668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}