{"id":1557,"date":"2008-02-03T13:24:48","date_gmt":"2007-11-28T22:08:55","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-11-28T22:08:55","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1557","title":{"rendered":"Crime committed against officers during illegal entry not suppressable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Colorado Supreme Court assumes but does not decide that three sheriff&#8217;s deputies entered defendant&#8217;s property in violation of the Fourth Amendment. In response to the violation, he allegedly committed criminal acts against the deputies, including menacing them with a shotgun. The trial court suppressed all the evidence of his criminal acts on the ground that the evidence was derived from the deputies&#8217; unconstitutional trespass. The Colorado court concludes that this evidence is not derivative of any constitutional violation, and reverses the trial court&#8217;s suppression order. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.co.us\/supct\/opinions\/2007\/07SA247.pdf\">People v. Doke<\/a>, 171 P.3d 237 (Colo. 2007). <em>Comment:<\/em> This is the settled general rule.<\/p>\n<p>Extending a traffic stop for lack of a seatbelt and a lack of a reflective strip on the temporary tag was defective for going beyond its purpose. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexisone.com\/lx1\/caselaw\/freecaselaw?action=FCLRetrieveCaseDetail&amp;caseID=1&amp;format=FULL&amp;resultHandle=52bb8a6bc98826ac85a256d1ad991045&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;xmlgTotalCount=1&amp;combinedSearchTerm=connor+and+date+geq+%2810%2F28%2F2007%29&amp;juriName=Georgia&amp;sourceFile=STATES;GACTS\">State v. Connor<\/a>, 288 Ga. App. 517, 654 S.E.2d 461 (2007):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As noted above, to pass muster under the Fourth Amendment, the continued questioning of a driver and passengers outside the scope of a valid traffic stop is permissible only when the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion of illegal activity or when the valid traffic stop has become consensual. &#8230; A consensual encounter requires the voluntary cooperation of a private citizen with non-coercive questioning by a law enforcement official. Because the individual is free to leave at any time during such an encounter, he is not \u201cseized\u201d within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.  &#8230; In looking to the totality of the circumstances to determine whether a reasonable person would have felt free to leave, three important factors have been given particular scrutiny: (a) whether the driver&#8217;s documents have been returned to him; (b) whether the officer informed the driver that he was free to leave; and (c) whether the driver appreciated that the traffic stop had reached an endpoint. &#8230; It is clear that \u201can encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver&#8217;s documents have been returned to him.\u201d (Citations omitted.) &#8230; <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There is no privity of parties between a preliminary hearing and a \u00a7 1983 case over the same arrest and search for issue preclusion to apply. Saunders v. Knight, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86291 (E.D. Cal. November 8, 2007).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=1557\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}