{"id":15033,"date":"2014-12-19T14:04:42","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T19:04:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15033"},"modified":"2014-12-28T11:01:19","modified_gmt":"2014-12-28T16:01:19","slug":"md-a-motion-for-return-of-property-cant-include-a-damages-claim-thats-a-separate-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15033","title":{"rendered":"MD: A motion for return of property can&#8217;t include a damages claim; that&#8217;s a separate action"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A motion for return of seized property can\u2019t include a claim for damages; it\u2019s only for return of property that the owner believes he or she is entitled to. A separate action has to be filed for that. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mdcourts.gov\/opinions\/cosa\/2014\/1154s13.pdf\">Bord v. Baltimore County<\/a>, 2014 Md. App. LEXIS 154 (December 17, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>Officers had reasonable suspicion for stopping defendant because of a possible gun. \u201cMoore disagrees, but only because he quibbles with the facts in this case.\u201d United States v. Moore, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173308 (D.D.C. December 15, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was stopped carrying an open container in a high crime area. When confronted by the officer, he took a step back, was asked about having a gun, and he sighed and said \u201cno.\u201d Because it was \u201chigh crime area rife with gun and drug violence,\u201d that was reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/10\/2014\/2014-ohio-5527.pdf\">State v. Bradford<\/a>, 2014-Ohio-5527, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 5339 (10th Dist. December 16, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A motion for return of seized property can\u2019t include a claim for damages; it\u2019s only for return of property that the owner believes he or she is entitled to. A separate action has to be filed for that. Bord v. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=15033\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,67],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-rule-41g-return-of-property"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15033"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15033\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15223,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15033\/revisions\/15223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}