{"id":14643,"date":"2014-12-09T09:18:05","date_gmt":"2014-12-09T14:18:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14643"},"modified":"2014-12-10T09:09:58","modified_gmt":"2014-12-10T14:09:58","slug":"ca7-consent-to-search-a-laptop-in-a-child-pornography-case-included-a-full-forensic-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14643","title":{"rendered":"CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On plain error review, consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca7.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&#038;Path=Y2014\/D12-05\/C:12-1630:J:Sykes:aut:T:fnOp:N:1465454:S:0\">United States v. Price<\/a>\\, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996 (7th Cir. December 5, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>There was no evidence defense counsel didn\u2019t tell defendant that the government would file a \u00a7 851 enhancement if a suppression motion was held, considering the enhancement was filed three weeks before the suppression hearing. United States v. Skoda, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169023 (D. Neb. December 5, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>The search warrant specified defendant\u2019s apartment and black Jeep. A sedan was searched, too. The car couldn\u2019t be searched under the warrant, but there was independent probable cause for that, so its search was valid under the automobile exception. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/40895.pdf\">State v. Gosch<\/a>, 2014 Ida. App. LEXIS 123 (December 3, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On plain error review, consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review. United States v. Price\\, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996 (7th Cir. December 5, 2014). There was no evidence defense counsel didn\u2019t &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=14643\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,24,23,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-consent","category-ineffective-assistance","category-warrant-execution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14643"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14643\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14647,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14643\/revisions\/14647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}