{"id":13990,"date":"2014-11-01T09:44:55","date_gmt":"2014-11-01T14:44:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13990"},"modified":"2014-11-02T07:37:14","modified_gmt":"2014-11-02T12:37:14","slug":"ar-locked-safe-in-car-could-be-searched-without-warrant-under-automobile-exception","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13990","title":{"rendered":"AR: Locked safe in car could be searched without warrant under automobile exception"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Where the automobile exception applies to a car, the state does not need a search warrant to search a locked safe found in it. <a href=\"http:\/\/opinions.aoc.arkansas.gov\/WebLink8\/0\/doc\/329622\/Page1.aspx\">State v. Crane<\/a>, 2014 Ark. 443, 2014 Ark. LEXIS 586 (October 30, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>The government did not waive an argument about which statute it was relying on for a stop where it first said at the hearing it wasn\u2019t relying on it, but then it reasserted the statute in a post-hearing brief. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/14\/10\/141015P.pdf\">United States v. Demilia<\/a>, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20684 (8th Cir. October 29, 2014).<\/p>\n<p>The past reliable CI\u2019s information here was that the defendant would be a passenger in a car arriving at a certain time with drugs. When the car and defendant arrived, there was at least reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. Rogers, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189001 (M.D. N.C. August 16, 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Where the automobile exception applies to a car, the state does not need a search warrant to search a locked safe found in it. State v. Crane, 2014 Ark. 443, 2014 Ark. LEXIS 586 (October 30, 2014). The government did &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13990\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,44,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-informant-hearsay","category-motion-to-suppress"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13990"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13990\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14007,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13990\/revisions\/14007"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}