A search warrant was issued for defendant\u2019s house, and an obvious scrivener\u2019s error at the time the warrant was issued was entered into the space providing for the latest time when the warrant should be executed. That error could be overlooked where the warrant was executed within three hours of issuance. Also, collective knowledge supported defendant\u2019s stop. United States v. McKay, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145985 (W.D. Pa. October 14, 2014).<\/p>\n
2255 petitioner\u2019s search and seizure claim was so vague court couldn\u2019t identify it. \u201cFinally, it is not clear which search or seizure Oakgrove is referring to when he indicates that his conviction was obtained through an unconstitutional search and seizure. Without additional information, the Court is unable to analyze the merits of Oakgrove’s claim, and will deny his petition on this ground.\u201d United States v. Oakgrove, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146206 (D. Minn. October 14, 2014).*<\/p>\n
The search warrant was issued with probable cause, and, even if not, it was close enough that the good faith exception applied. United States v. Shelton, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146063 (D. Minn. October 14, 2014),* R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146367 (D. Minn. August 28, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A search warrant was issued for defendant\u2019s house, and an obvious scrivener\u2019s error at the time the warrant was issued was entered into the space providing for the latest time when the warrant should be executed. That error could be … Continue reading