{"id":13583,"date":"2014-10-06T15:03:40","date_gmt":"2014-10-06T20:03:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13583"},"modified":"2014-10-07T10:10:10","modified_gmt":"2014-10-07T15:10:10","slug":"wapo-oral-argument-in-heien-v-north-carolina","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13583","title":{"rendered":"WaPo: Oral argument in Heien v. North Carolina"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>WaPo: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/volokh-conspiracy\/wp\/2014\/10\/06\/oral-argument-in-heien-v-north-carolina\/\">Oral argument in Heien v. North Carolina<\/a> by Orin Kerr: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I attended the oral argument this morning in the Supreme Court\u2019s first case of the new Term, Heien v. North Carolina. I had a long preview of Heien here. Here are some impressions of the argument.<\/p>\n<p>On the whole, I thought the argument was puzzling. A large chunk of the argument time was spent on Justice Scalia\u2019s insistence that the Court could not render a decision on the rights question alone without also ruling on whether the exclusionary rule was available. I found this odd for two reasons. First, the state had never argued the exclusionary rule. The state\u2019s Brief in Opposition had argued that it would be better to review a different case in which the exclusionary rule issue was also part of the case, a position the Justices presumably weighed before granting cert on just the rights question.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WaPo: Oral argument in Heien v. North Carolina by Orin Kerr: I attended the oral argument this morning in the Supreme Court\u2019s first case of the new Term, Heien v. North Carolina. I had a long preview of Heien here. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13583\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13583"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13590,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583\/revisions\/13590"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}