{"id":13304,"date":"2014-09-18T00:33:00","date_gmt":"2014-09-18T05:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13304"},"modified":"2014-09-16T07:54:28","modified_gmt":"2014-09-16T12:54:28","slug":"ca9-suspicionless-searches-and-gps-monitoring-reasonable-for-repeat-cp-offender","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13304","title":{"rendered":"CA9: Suspicionless searches and GPS monitoring reasonable for repeat CP offender"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s conditions of supervised release including suspicionless searches and GPS monitoring were reasonable because defendant wasn\u2019t a first time child pornography offender. <a href=\"http:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/memoranda\/2014\/09\/10\/13-30144.pdf\">United States v. Tafelmeyer<\/a>, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17491 (9th Cir. September 10, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant consented to a search of the house he shared with his father, but he deferred to his father for consent of a locked storage room. The evidence supports that the father consented to a search of that room. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kscourts.org\/Cases-and-Opinions\/opinions\/SupCt\/2014\/20140905\/107962.pdf\">State v. Richard<\/a>, 2014 Kan. LEXIS 498 (September 5, 2014).*<\/p>\n<p>The search of defendant\u2019s car was valid under the automobile exception because it was reasonable for officers to believe that there was evidence of a robbery in the car. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/sites\/default\/files\/weilackerstephanoopn.pdf\">State v. Weilacker<\/a>, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 875 (September 8, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s conditions of supervised release including suspicionless searches and GPS monitoring were reasonable because defendant wasn\u2019t a first time child pornography offender. United States v. Tafelmeyer, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17491 (9th Cir. September 10, 2014).* Defendant consented to a &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=13304\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,24,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-consent","category-probationparole-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13304"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13305,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13304\/revisions\/13305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}