A typo in the address, 1557 v. 1577, was not material where the application for the search warrant had a photograph of the property involved. United States v. Padilla, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104023 (D. Colo. July 30, 2014).<\/p>\n
Exigent circumstances of a de facto hot pursuit supported gathering defendant\u2019s CSLI without a search warrant long before Riley. Besides, defendant was on parole, and his parole status essentially waived that too. State v. Cotham, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 763 (July 31, 2014).*<\/p>\n
Driving up to the Wendy\u2019s drive-thru lane late at night and asking for a beer on the ordering intercom validly led to defendant being stopped with reasonable suspicion he was under the influence. State v. Brooks<\/a>, 2014-Ohio-3343, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 3272 (4th Dist. July 21, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A typo in the address, 1557 v. 1577, was not material where the application for the search warrant had a photograph of the property involved. United States v. Padilla, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104023 (D. Colo. July 30, 2014). Exigent … Continue reading