Nervous behavior with an expired inspection sticker is not reasonable suspicion for extending a stop. United States v. Mooneyham, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58952 (W.D. Tex. August 10, 2007).*<\/p>\n
School search of plaintiff was justified at its inception by the fact plaintiff was seen entering an area where an explosion occurred just five seconds before. Plaintiff also had a history of disciplinary problems and had an odor of gunpowder on his hands when confronted. The fact he was not charged with a crime is irrelevant. Richardson v. Bd. of Educ. Ky., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58960 (W.D. Ky. August 10, 2007).*<\/p>\n
“[E]ven though the warrant did not specifically permit the officers to search the fields on the farm, the officers were entitled to search them without a warrant under the open fields doctrine.” United States v. Brown, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58958 (W.D. Ky. August 9, 2007).*<\/p>\n
Habeas petitioner loses on IAC claim because defense counsel’s failure to file a suppression motion was objectively reasonable because it could not be won both because of defendant’s consent and inevitable discovery because, without the consent, a search warrant would have issued. Ruiz v. Hall, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58728 (N.D. Cal. July 30, 2007).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading