The stop was of reasonable duration before consent was sought. \u201cOnce Jaramillo consented to the search of the Tahoe, \u2018the clock re-started for purposes of evaluating the reasonableness of the duration of the intrusion.\u2019 Hernandez, 418 F.3d at 1210 (citation omitted).\u201d United States v. Jaramillo, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91027 (N.D. Ga. April 25, 2014).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s stop would have been valid on reasonable suspicion on the totality, but the trial court erroneously required probable cause. Reversed. People v. Yanez<\/a>, 2014 IL App (1st) 123364, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 475 (June 30, 2014).*<\/p>\n Defense counsel did, in fact, fully pursue the search issue before the district court, so he couldn\u2019t be ineffective for not. United States v. Cephas, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90675 (E.D. Pa. July 2, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The stop was of reasonable duration before consent was sought. \u201cOnce Jaramillo consented to the search of the Tahoe, \u2018the clock re-started for purposes of evaluating the reasonableness of the duration of the intrusion.\u2019 Hernandez, 418 F.3d at 1210 (citation … Continue reading