{"id":12152,"date":"2014-06-22T11:05:55","date_gmt":"2014-06-22T16:05:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12152"},"modified":"2014-10-07T17:09:20","modified_gmt":"2014-10-07T22:09:20","slug":"or-ordering-defendant-out-of-his-house-for-a-fst-was-a-stop-and-detention-as-a-show-of-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=12152","title":{"rendered":"OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a \u201cstop\u201d and detention as a show of authority"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ordering defendant out of his house for a FST was a \u201cstop\u201d and detention under the state constitution because it was a show of authority. State v. Charles<\/a>, 263 Or. App. ___, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 804 (June 18, 2014).<\/p>\n

\u201cAn administrative seizure, too, must be \u2018specifically authorized\u2019 by law. Unlike with inventory searches, police are allowed to use discretion when deciding whether to carry out an administrative seizure.\u201d If a criminal search will follow, the administrative seizure is invalid, and that happened here. State v. Lambert<\/a>, 263 Or. App. 683, 328 P.3d 824 (2014),* reconsideration granted State v. Lambert<\/a>, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1322 (October 1, 2014)* and posted here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The particularity question was not preserved for appellate review where the suppression motion dealt almost entirely with whether the warrant should have issued under Franks v. Delaware. Rawls v. Commonwealth<\/a>, 2014 Ky. LEXIS 241 (June 19, 2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ordering defendant out of his house for a FST was a \u201cstop\u201d and detention under the state constitution because it was a show of authority. State v. Charles, 263 Or. App. ___, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 804 (June 18, 2014). … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,6,65,53,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-inventory","category-motion-to-suppress","category-particularity","category-state-constitution","category-stop-and-frisk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12152"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13605,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12152\/revisions\/13605"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}