Gant did not void the search of defendant\u2019s car where he\u2019d already admitted there was methamphetamine in the car. Searching the car for meth, officers found a firearm and defendant was a convicted felon. United States v. Spack, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66517 (D. Minn. April 23, 2014) <\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s stop was based on a 911 call where the caller reported that a man in a silver Infiniti pointed a gun at them in a high crime area and, during the call, yelled \u201cthat\u2019s the car!\u201d They gave the license number and the car was stopped. United States v. Williams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66936 (D. Mass. May 15, 2014).*<\/p>\n
\u201cAlthough Yazzie asserts that he did not know at the time of his plea that he was waiving the protections of rule 410 or that he was pleading guilty to an information rather than an indictment [and waiving his motion to suppress], these arguments do not render his guilty plea unknowing and involuntary.\u201d United States v. Yazzie, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66729 (D. N.M. May 6, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gant did not void the search of defendant\u2019s car where he\u2019d already admitted there was methamphetamine in the car. Searching the car for meth, officers found a firearm and defendant was a convicted felon. United States v. Spack, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading