Defendant had a rental car one month past its three day rental period, and it had been reported stolen. He had no standing or reasonable expectation of privacy in the car. United States v. Brown, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59747 (D. Ore. April 30, 2014).<\/p>\n
The drug dog officer testified to the dog\u2019s certification, so it wasn\u2019t necessary to produce the logs. Defendant\u2019s search after the dog alert produced 30 credit cards, some of which proved to be reprogrammed. His guilty plea waived any issue with the search warrant for a computer found in the vehicle. United States v. Burrows<\/a>, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8226 (11th Cir. May 1, 2014).*<\/p>\n \u201cWe conclude the court properly found, \u2018The Defendant cannot maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage that has been set out to be picked up by a public agency and is thereafter available for public scrutiny at that point.\u2019\u201d Even if defendant\u2019s old convictions in the search warrant affidavit were considered stale and not considered, probable cause remains on the rest. State v. May<\/a>, 2014 Iowa App. LEXIS 475 (April 30, 2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant had a rental car one month past its three day rental period, and it had been reported stolen. He had no standing or reasonable expectation of privacy in the car. United States v. Brown, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59747 … Continue reading