Defendant was arrested at home for money laundering. A protective sweep of the premises revealed a Lamborghini and Ferrari in the garage, and they were seized for forfeiture. An inventory of the vehicles in aid of the forfeitures was proper. United States v. Cosme, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55415 (S.D. N.Y. April 21, 2014).<\/p>\n
The affidavit for the search warrant in this murder case, judged by the totality of the circumstances, shows probable cause for its issuance. It was not \u201cbare bones.\u201d State v. Corey<\/a>, 2014 W. Va. LEXIS 452 (April 23, 2014).*<\/p>\n At the time the GPS was installed on defendant\u2019s car, state case law said it was not a constitutional violation. Then along came Jones<\/a> from SCOTUS. Under Davis<\/a>, then, the fact case law said it was valid at the time it was installed was good faith. State v. Oberst<\/a>, 2014 Wisc. App. LEXIS 335 (April 23, 2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant was arrested at home for money laundering. A protective sweep of the premises revealed a Lamborghini and Ferrari in the garage, and they were seized for forfeiture. An inventory of the vehicles in aid of the forfeitures was proper. … Continue reading