A woman answered the door at 10 am in a bathrobe, suggesting she lived there or at least spent the night. Further inquiry showed apparent authority. Her consent \u201ctrumped\u201d defendant\u2019s remote refusal. United States v. Terry, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54866 (N.D. Ill. April 21, 2014).<\/p>\n
Speeding justified the stop and the smell of marijuana provided probable cause. United States v. Thomas, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54897 (M.D. Ala. April 21, 2014).*<\/p>\n
The traffic stop was valid and based on following too close. The continuation of the stop for 16 minutes through the warning ticket was normal and \u201cde minimus.\u201d United States v. Dodwell, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54968 (W.D. N.C. January 17, 2014),* adopted 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54969 (W.D. N.C. April 21, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A woman answered the door at 10 am in a bathrobe, suggesting she lived there or at least spent the night. Further inquiry showed apparent authority. Her consent \u201ctrumped\u201d defendant\u2019s remote refusal. United States v. Terry, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading