\u201cThere are no shortage of cases wherein a man accused of assaulting and expelling his live-in girlfriend found himself in federal court arguing that she did not have apparent authority to consent to a search of the dwelling where he kept his drugs and guns. [\u00b6] Further, a survey of those cases reveal that the Clay’s counterparts have found themselves in an uphill battle to make a showing that the women who they cohabitated with did not, in fact, have the apparent authority to consent to a search to the place from which they had been driven by their abusive boyfriends.\u201d United States v. Clay, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21109 (E.D. Ky. February 20, 2014), R&R 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185326 (E.D. Ky. December 31, 2013).<\/p>\n
The officer got a radio call about a vehicle suspected of DWI. He saw the vehicle in a parking lot with defendant walking away from it, and defendant appeared and smelled under the influence. That was probable cause for his arrest. State v. Reese<\/a>, 2014 Wisc. App. LEXIS 145 (February 20, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading