{"id":10421,"date":"2014-02-21T09:43:12","date_gmt":"2014-02-21T09:43:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2014-06-24T07:15:02","modified_gmt":"2014-06-24T12:15:02","slug":"en-us-88","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=10421","title":{"rendered":"CA6: \u201c[T]he warrant\u2014although far from a model of careful drafting\u2014satisfies the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment.\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The search warrant in this armed robbery case wasn\u2019t proofread, reading the warrant \u201cas a whole\u201d it was clear what was sought, so the warrant was not general. \u201c[T]he warrant\u2014although far from a model of careful drafting\u2014satisfies the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/14a0144n-06.pdf\">United States v. Anderson<\/a>, 555 Fed. Appx. 589 (6th Cir. 2014):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Here, although the warrant was inartfully drafted and apparently never proofread, it is not limited to a nonsequitur comparable to the warrant in Groh. Although Detective Coleman inserted a paragraph-length account of the Hampton Inn robbery in the space where a list of evidence should have appeared, the items to be seized can easily be gleaned from a &#8220;commonsense and realistic&#8221; reading of the warrant. See United States v. Dunn, 269 F. App&#8217;x 567, 571 (6th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). These items include a &#8220;black assault rifle,&#8221; a &#8220;dark colored &#8216;stocking mask,'&#8221; a &#8220;dark colored Atlanta Braves [b]aseball cap,&#8221; a &#8220;red hooded pullover,&#8221; a &#8220;dark shirt,&#8221; a &#8220;red lanyard,&#8221; and &#8220;dark colored shoes.&#8221; (App&#8217;x to Appellant&#8217;s Br. at A-4) Accordingly, the warrant\u2014although far from a model of careful drafting\u2014satisfies the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=10421\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10421"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10421\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12181,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10421\/revisions\/12181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}