The search warrant wasn\u2019t stale because the affidavit set out that this was a multi-year drug trafficking organization. \u201cThe Court also factors the nature of the place to be searched into its staleness calculation. … Here, the place searched was defendants’ permanent residence, making it more likely that items would remain within the home over an extended period of time.\u201d United States v. Arce-Lopez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18472 (D. P.R. February 11, 2014).*<\/p>\n
Once a forfeiture of cash occurs, the owner can\u2019t use a motion for return of seized property to get it back. Green v. State<\/a>, 2014 Ark. 69, 2014 Ark. LEXIS 117 (February 13, 2014).*<\/p>\n Officers had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant\u2019s vehicle, and the gun and a ring were in plain view, visible from outside. United States v. Jarrett, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18005 (W.D. Pa. February 12, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading