At a border checkpoint, a Lexus was allowed to pass. A pickup was next with the same story and 11 people laying down in the back covered up. The story from the Lexus was similar to the one of the driver of the pickup, and that with other factors was reasonable suspicion under Brignoni-Ponce for a stop. United States v. Salazar, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13944 (W.D. Tex. February 3, 2014).*<\/p>\n
Considering the \u201cgreat deference\u201d given search warrants, the court finds probable cause for the search warrant and, in any event, good faith for reliance on it. United States v. Mshihiri, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184707 (D. Minn. December 20, 2013).*<\/p>\n
No evidence supported defendant\u2019s claim that the CI was an agent of the police at the time of his private search of defendant\u2019s backpack. Sweet v. State<\/a>, 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 47 (February 5, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading