Even though the state trooper\u2019s primary purpose was interdiction, there was a factual basis for stopping defendant for not having headlights on during a period of rain. Defendant\u2019s backing out of the car and the way he held his body suggested he was armed, and that justified a patdown. United States v. Patterson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11014 (D. Conn. January 29, 2014).*<\/p>\n
There was reasonable suspicion for detaining defendant who was walking away from the scene of a recent robbery, and he matched the description. The stop didn\u2019t ripen into an arrest until later. United States v. Young, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10820 (D. Nev. January 17, 2014).*<\/p>\n
Officers had multiple reports that a green Durango was involved in a shots fired incident, and that provided reason for its stop. United States v. Morris, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10567 (D. Minn. January 14, 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading