Defendant\u2019s refusal to remove his hands from his hoodie pockets in a late night encounter while the police were responding to a burglary report justified a frisk. United States v. Lowe, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2801 (E.D. Pa. January 8, 2014).<\/p>\n
Defendants lack standing to challenge seizure of bank records by subpoena. The government complied with the Right to Financial Privacy Act, but suppression is not a remedy if they did anyway. United States v. Frantz, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182839 (D. Minn. December 23, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant sought review of the Fourth Amendment issue pro se in a letter, and it\u2019s rejected both as undeveloped and incapable of IAC review at this point. United States v. Harris<\/a>, 740 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 2014).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading