CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

This search warrant didn’t go stale in the three days between the controlled buy and its execution. United States v. Lawrence, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9780 (6th Cir. Apr. 3, 2026).*

The BAC blood draw statute includes drawing and testing, and that’s imported into the warrant. Testing could also be done. State v. Allen, 2026 Utah App. LEXIS 105 (Apr. 2, 2026).*

Plaintiff was served with a writ of ejectment under state law which he can’t challenge in federal court. He has a state remedy. Lee v. Hitt, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73760 (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2026).*

2254 petitioner is barred from a Fourth Amendment claim because he litigated it below, he just disagrees with how it was done, and there was no “unconscionable breakdown” in state procedure. Smith v. Warden, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73815 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Issue preclusion, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.