CO: Incorporated and attached affidavit to SW narrowed its scope

The warrant included the application for it as defining its scope and it was attached. That limited the time and subject matter of the search. People v. Stauch, 2026 COA 22 (Apr. 2, 2026).

The inventory of defendant’s car was justified because it was valuable and could be a theft target. It was apparent to the trial court that the inventory was not a ruse for a criminal search. United States v. Riner, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9575 (9th Cir. Apr. 2, 2026).*

Defendant had an improperly licensed vehicle he illegally parked. When questioned by the police about it, he got a cigarette out of the car and walked off. The inventory was valid, and this was also an abandonment. State v. Garcia, 2026 Conn. Super. LEXIS 560 (Mar. 26, 2026).*

The cybertip to NCMEC did not lead to an unreasonable search even if the police exceeded the private search. And, even if it did, there was plenty of independent probable cause for the search warrant. United States v. Perez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72190 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Independent source, Inventory, Particularity, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.