D.D.C.: Video surveillance of public housing hallways is like a pole camera with no REP

Plaintiff sued a public housing project which has sophisticated video surveillance but only in common areas. The court holds that it doesn’t rise to the level of the mosaic theory and is more akin to a pole camera. Pondexter-Moore v. D.C. Hous. Auth., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69893 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2026).

This commercial vehicle inspection resulted in reasonable suspicion the driver was impaired. State v. Welch, 2026 Iowa App. LEXIS 281 (Apr. 1, 2026).*

This search claim that the citizen informant was unpreserved in the trial court, but, what little there is in the record means the issue is going nowhere. Citizen informants are almost always presumptively reliable. State v. Allen, 2026 Iowa App. LEXIS 314 (Apr. 1, 2026).*

There’s no hard and fast rule that a person with a weapon needs to be warned before deadly force will be used. Rosete v. City of Homestead, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70901 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.