D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

Defendant was stopped walking and surrounded by three officers shining flashlights in his face, and all without reasonable suspicion. Only then did they discover a telling bulge from a weapon. Suppressed. United States v. Wilson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69861 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2026).

Seizure of an older Android phone was justified by the warrant. Searcy v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 99 (Mar. 30, 2026).*

A controlled buy from defendant’s house within the previous three days was probable cause to believe more would be there. United States v. Mooneyham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69109 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 2, 2026).*

No particular dog alert is required for the Fourth Amendment. It’s what the totality shows. United States v. Conchas-Mancilla, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9312 (5th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.