W.D.Ark.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing. Owen v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42184 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 20, 2026) (recognizing rule).

The officer here blocked defendant’s parked car while he was in it, so that was a stop. Remanded for a determination of reasonable suspicion. State v. Bennett, 2026-Ohio-698 (9th Dist. Mar. 2, 2026).*

The government elects not to use CSLI in this case, so the motion to suppress it is moot. United States v. Browne, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40936 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 4, 2026).*

Two doctors showed probable cause to believe plaintiff was a danger and that justified his mental health hold in the face of a Fourth Amendment claim. Mulvey v. Nassau Univ. Med. Ctr., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41177 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.