OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

Cleveland’s city elevator inspector got permission from the maintenance persons at three apartment buildings in Cleveland to conduct regular inspections. This was all by consent. The court thus does not have to decide whether the inspections were also valid as a part of a regulatory scheme. City of Cleveland v. Shaker Heights Apartments Owner LLC, 2026-Ohio-449 (8th Dist. Feb. 12, 2026).*

Officers got a tip that defendant was a drug dealer. They set up surveillance. She didn’t leave the house much at all and she had two cars, one with an out of state plate, and surveillance cameras. That suggested to them she was a drug dealer. Then they did a trash pull finding marijuana and used paraphernalia. That was probable cause for a warrant. State v. Revuelta, 2026 UT App 21 (Feb. 12, 2026).*

Defendant had fled police before. This time, they followed until he stopped and got out of the car, and they approached the passenger who denied knowing him. This involved a reasonable plain view and protective sweep of the car. Jones v. State, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 1259 (Fla. 6th DCA Feb. 13, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Protective sweep. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.